All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met only two of the ten required criteria (awards and exhibitions), failing to reach the minimum of three. The evidence for published material (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) was deficient due to a lack of circulation data and non-compliant foreign language translations. Consequently, the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the EB-1A classification.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met only one criterion (artistic display) instead of the required three. Specifically, the prizes lacked documentation of national significance, the media coverage was local and focused on volunteer work rather than musical expertise, and there was no evidence of judging the work of others or holding a leading/critical role in a distinguished organization.