Visalytics
Visalytics
dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Furniture Designer

Arts · Thailand · 2024-07-11

Decision Date
2024-07-11
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Lesser prizes or awards (Met)

The Director determined the Petitioner satisfied the criterion for receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards.

Artistic exhibitions or showcases (Met)

The Director determined the Petitioner satisfied the criterion for work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Published material about the noncitizen (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to provide objective evidence such as circulation data or rankings to prove the publications qualified as major media.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met only two of the ten required criteria (awards and exhibitions), failing to reach the minimum of three. The evidence for published material (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) was deficient due to a lack of circulation data and non-compliant foreign language translations. Consequently, the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the EB-1A classification.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence to establish that the articles submitted were published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. The Petitioner responded with descriptions of the articles and circulation figures but lacked objective supporting documentation.

RFE Targets
Published material about the noncitizen

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Exhibitions
Media Coverage
Evidence Submitted
  • Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
  • Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
  • Six online articles and various newspaper/magazine features (determined not to meet major media standards)

Similar Cases

Others

Art and Design

USCIS EB-1A remanded
2024-07-02
The Petitioner satisfied at least three criteria: published material, judging the work of others, and display of work at artistic exhibitions. Specifically, the record included documentation of work displayed at artistic exhibitions at the [redacted] and the [redacted]. Because the initial evidentiary threshold was met, the Director's previous denial was withdrawn to allow for a final merits determination.

Others

Art and Design

USCIS EB-1A remanded
New York 2024-06-26
The Petitioner met the criteria for published material (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) through features in Art in America, Artforum, and The New York Times. Additionally, the criteria for judging (iv) and artistic exhibitions (vii) were previously conceded as met. The Director's decision was withdrawn because the Petitioner successfully established the minimum three criteria required for further evaluation.

Unknown Position

Performing Arts

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-30
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to submit new, determinative evidence that the awards had national or international recognition, with some evidence being dated after the filing date. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, merely disagreeing with the conclusions. The Petitioner's participation in an artistic performance show was not considered a competition awarding prizes, and photos of participation did not prove the requisite recognition of awards.

Makeup Artist

Cosmetics

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-08-06
The Director's decision was withdrawn and the matter remanded because the decision did not adequately address the Petitioner's claims and evidence regarding the judging criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv)) and failed to consider the Petitioner's RFE response for the exhibition criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii)). The AAO found the decision insufficient for review, preventing a fair opportunity to contest on appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Art and Design cases More cases from Thailand

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-07-11.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 3

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Thailand All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist