All Cases

The Petitioner failed to meet at least three EB-1A criteria, satisfying only the artistic display criterion. Claims for awards, published material, original contributions, leading roles, high salary, and commercial success were rejected due to lack of evidence of national/international recognition, missing authorship/circulation data, and failure to show major significance in the field.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria, satisfying only the 'judging' criterion. Specifically, the awards claimed were not sufficiently proven to be nationally or internationally recognized, and the memberships did not require outstanding achievements as a condition. The published materials were not demonstrated to be from professional, major trade, or major media publications due to a lack of objective evidence like comparative circulation data. Furthermore, the Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, having no documented participation in competitions since 2015, despite some early career medals and media mentions.