Visalytics
Visalytics
dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Downhill Longboard Athlete

Downhill Longboard Athlete · Argentina · 2024-11-22

Decision Date
2024-11-22
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of 3 criteria met
Judging the work of others (Met)

The Petitioner satisfied this criterion by documenting participation as a judge in two downhill longboard competitions in Argentina in 2018 and 2022.

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (Not Met)

The Petitioner's first-place awards from 2011 and 2015 were not sufficiently demonstrated to be nationally or internationally recognized, as corroborating evidence beyond organizer/sponsor statements was lacking.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements (Not Met)

Membership in the AAL and IDF did not meet the criterion, as the associations' statutes did not indicate that outstanding achievements, judged by national or international experts, were a condition for membership.

Published material about the individual in major media (Not Met)

The articles and interviews were not proven to be from professional, major trade, or major media publications due to insufficient objective evidence like comparative circulation data or proof of intended audience.

Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance (Not Met)

The Director determined that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that he has made original athletic contributions of major significance in his sport, and the AAO reserved discussion on this criterion as it was unnecessary for the ultimate decision.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria, satisfying only the 'judging' criterion. Specifically, the awards claimed were not sufficiently proven to be nationally or internationally recognized, and the memberships did not require outstanding achievements as a condition. The published materials were not demonstrated to be from professional, major trade, or major media publications due to a lack of objective evidence like comparative circulation data. Furthermore, the Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, having no documented participation in competitions since 2015, despite some early career medals and media mentions.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested additional evidence to establish the national or international recognition of the Petitioner's awards and to demonstrate that the published materials were from professional or major media outlets. The Petitioner submitted additional letters and background information, but these were deemed insufficient to address the concerns.

RFE Targets
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awardsPublished material about the individual in major media

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Media Coverage
Professional Memberships
Judging Experience
Evidence Submitted
  • medals in competitions
  • participation as a judge in two downhill longboard competitions (2018, 2022)
  • membership in the Argentine Longboard Association (AAL)
  • membership in the International Downhill Federation (IDF)
  • magazine articles from Caras, Gente, and Longway
  • online articles from IDF website and Rock N Board
  • video interviews on Canal de la Ciudad Abierta and Ciudad Magazine

Similar Cases

Others

Sports

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-11-25
The appeal is dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. While the Petitioner satisfied the 'lesser awards' criterion by demonstrating first and second-place finishes in several marathons with media coverage, she failed to prove membership in an association requiring outstanding achievements (national team) and did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance, as her race wins and course records were deemed to satisfy the awards criterion, not a separate contribution criterion. The record did not support sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is at the very top of her field.

Coach

Sports

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2025-02-26
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the matter because the Director failed to provide a complete analysis and sufficient basis for denial. Specifically, the Director did not discuss or analyze evidence submitted for criteria (iii), (v), and (ix), comparable evidence, or fully evaluate evidence for criteria (i) and (viii). The Director also made factual errors regarding the Petitioner's occupation and RFE dates.

Athlete

Sports · Kyrgyzstan

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-08-02
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for extraordinary ability by not meeting at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the AAO withdrew the Director's finding that the judging criterion was met, citing insufficient evidence regarding the nature and level of judging activities. The published material criterion was also not met due to outdated viewership statistics for the media outlet and the author not being identified. The awards criterion was not addressed as it would not change the outcome, and the membership criterion was met but insufficient on its own.

Others

Sports · Venezuela

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-09-12
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum requirement of satisfying at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. While the AAO found the Petitioner met the 'lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards' criterion and the Director found the 'published materials' criterion met, the 'memberships' and 'leading or critical role' criteria were not satisfied. The record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner was among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Sports cases More cases from Argentina

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-11-22.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 1 / 3
Evidence Types 4

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Argentina All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist