Quality Control Chemist

The Beneficiary was intended to serve as a quality assurance leader for an automotive glass repair and replacement company. The role involved overseeing quality standards and processes within the petitioner's IT or operational framework.

The appeal was dismissed because the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) found that the Director's interpretation of the labor certification's plain language was correct. The labor certification's part H.14 explicitly stated a five-year experience requirement for specific duties and technologies, which the Beneficiary did not meet. The AAO determined there was no ambiguity in the language, thus precluding consideration of the Petitioner's additional evidence or claimed intent regarding an alternate three-year experience criterion.

The AAO dismissed the motions because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 classification. Specifically, the petitioner did not demonstrate that her two foreign diplomas, each requiring less than four years of study, were equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation did not adequately explain this equivalency, nor did it clearly establish that the petitioner's seven years of work experience were 'post-baccalaureate' as claimed, thus failing to meet the advanced degree or its equivalent requirement for EB-2.

The Beneficiary is intended to be employed as a management analyst for a distributor of used clothing. The role involves analyzing business operations and management processes to improve efficiency within the company's distribution framework.