Others

The decision does not describe the specific proposed endeavor as it focused on the threshold eligibility issue of the Petitioner's professional qualifications.

The AAO dismissed the motions because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 classification. Specifically, the petitioner did not demonstrate that her two foreign diplomas, each requiring less than four years of study, were equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation did not adequately explain this equivalency, nor did it clearly establish that the petitioner's seven years of work experience were 'post-baccalaureate' as claimed, thus failing to meet the advanced degree or its equivalent requirement for EB-2.

The petitioner sought a national interest waiver for employment-based second preference classification, but the specific nature of the proposed work was not detailed in the decision as the case was dismissed on threshold eligibility grounds.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional. The primary reason was the lack of sufficient documentation for five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B). Employment letters submitted contained unresolved inconsistencies and incongruous/overlapping employment timeframes, undermining their probative value. The petitioner earned a baccalaureate degree in business administration in 2009, and the petition was filed in April 2019, but the experience was not adequately proven. A self-reported updated resume was deemed insufficient without corroborating evidence.