Not Explicitly Stated (Petitioner Holds A Degree In Business Administration)

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to provide evidence of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience required for EB-2 status. Despite a Request for Evidence (RFE), no employment verification letters were found in the record, and the Petitioner did not provide them on appeal.

The AAO dismissed the motions because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 classification. Specifically, the petitioner did not demonstrate that her two foreign diplomas, each requiring less than four years of study, were equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation did not adequately explain this equivalency, nor did it clearly establish that the petitioner's seven years of work experience were 'post-baccalaureate' as claimed, thus failing to meet the advanced degree or its equivalent requirement for EB-2.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional due to insufficient employer letters proving five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. Additionally, the petitioner did not meet at least three of the six criteria for exceptional ability, specifically failing to provide employer letters for ten years of experience, demonstrate exceptional salary relative to peers, or show recognition for significant contributions to the field beyond a single employer. The additional evidence submitted on motion did not establish new facts or overcome these deficiencies.

The petitioner's specific endeavor is not detailed in the decision, as the AAO reserved the discussion on national importance due to the dispositive nature of the petitioner's failure to qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification.