remanded EB-2 (NIW) RFE Issued

Nautical Science Professional

Nautical Science · 2024-04-25

Decision Date
2024-04-25
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Proposed Endeavor

The Petitioner submitted a professional plan and expert opinion letters regarding her work in the field of Nautical Science. The specific details of the endeavor were not fully detailed in the appellate decision, but it involves her professional expertise in the maritime/nautical field.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
1 Substantial Merit and National Importance Not Met

The Director concluded the endeavor lacked merit and importance without providing analysis of the submitted professional plan and expert letters.

2 Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor Not Met

The Director ignored evidence of academic qualifications and professional achievements, failing to explain why the evidence was deficient.

3 On Balance, Beneficial to Waive Job Offer Not Met

The Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations required for the third prong.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to provide a detailed analysis of the evidence and reached conclusory findings. Additionally, the Petitioner provided new clarifying evidence regarding her academic degree's equivalency and professional experience to satisfy the underlying EB-2 classification requirements.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence to satisfy the Dhanasar prongs and EB-2 classification; the petitioner responded with academic evaluations and experience letters, but the Director's review was found to be conclusory.

RFE Targets
Substantial Merit and National ImportanceWell Positioned to Advance the EndeavorOn Balance, Beneficial to Waive Job Offer

Evidence

Evidence Types
Reference Letters Dependent
Professional Memberships

Similar Cases

Researcher

Others

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) remanded
2024-11-22
The petitioner's proposed endeavor is to work as a Researcher in the field of Nutrition. The specific research area, methodologies, and intended impact are not detailed in the provided text.

Others

Others

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
Not stated 2024-07-01
The petitioner's specific endeavor is not detailed in the decision, as the AAO reserved the discussion on national importance due to the dispositive nature of the petitioner's failure to qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification.

Others

Unknown Industry

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2025-02-03
The petitioner's proposed endeavor involves pursuing a career with the military, specifically in an Information role, with a clear path to the Officer Route. He claims his expertise has benefited various organizations and his work has been used by others without proper credit.

Business Manager

Human Resources · Brazil

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) rfe remanded
2024-08-08
The petitioner intends to act as a business administrator in charge of human resources. The work involves helping organizations function efficiently and recommending changes to policies or procedures to improve operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-2 NIW petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-04-25.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 2

EB-2 (NIW) Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 3,895
Success Rate 54.2%
Sustained 2,112
Dismissed 1,687

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist