Nautical Science Professional
Nautical Science · 2024-04-25
Proposed Endeavor
The Petitioner submitted a professional plan and expert opinion letters regarding her work in the field of Nautical Science. The specific details of the endeavor were not fully detailed in the appellate decision, but it involves her professional expertise in the maritime/nautical field.
Framework Evaluation
0 of 3 criteria metThe Director concluded the endeavor lacked merit and importance without providing analysis of the submitted professional plan and expert letters.
The Director ignored evidence of academic qualifications and professional achievements, failing to explain why the evidence was deficient.
The Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations required for the third prong.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe RFE requested evidence to satisfy the Dhanasar prongs and EB-2 classification; the petitioner responded with academic evaluations and experience letters, but the Director's review was found to be conclusory.
Evidence
Similar Cases
Researcher
Others
Others
Others
Others
Unknown Industry
Business Manager
Human Resources · Brazil
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-04-25.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-2 (NIW) Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist