Marketing Specialist

The AAO dismissed the motions because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 classification. Specifically, the petitioner did not demonstrate that her two foreign diplomas, each requiring less than four years of study, were equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation did not adequately explain this equivalency, nor did it clearly establish that the petitioner's seven years of work experience were 'post-baccalaureate' as claimed, thus failing to meet the advanced degree or its equivalent requirement for EB-2.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional due to insufficient employer letters proving five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. Additionally, the petitioner did not meet at least three of the six criteria for exceptional ability, specifically failing to provide employer letters for ten years of experience, demonstrate exceptional salary relative to peers, or show recognition for significant contributions to the field beyond a single employer. The additional evidence submitted on motion did not establish new facts or overcome these deficiencies.

The petitioner's proposed endeavor is not detailed in the decision, as the appeal was dismissed based on the failure to meet the underlying EB-2 immigrant classification requirements regarding education and exceptional ability.

The decision does not describe the specific proposed endeavor as it focused on the threshold eligibility issue of the Petitioner's professional qualifications.