dismissed EB-2 (NIW)

Historical Architect

Historical Architect · 2024-08-14

Decision Date
2024-08-14
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
1 Proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance Not Met

The Petitioner has not sufficiently demonstrated the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong of the analytical framework.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The AAO dismissed the appeal and subsequent motions because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong of the Dhanasar framework. The Petitioner did not present new facts or evidence in her motions to reopen, nor did she establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy for reconsideration.

Similar Cases

Architect

Architecture

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2025-01-15
The petitioner, a historical architect, seeks an EB-2 national interest waiver. The specific details of the proposed endeavor are not described beyond the general field of work.

Architect

Architecture

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2022-06-07
The petitioner is an architect seeking to work in the United States. The specific details of the research area or methodologies were not elaborated upon in the dismissal.

Architect

Architecture · Colombia

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2023-03-29
The petitioner, an architect, seeks to work in the United States within her field of specialty. The specific details of her proposed research or work focus were not discussed in the decision due to the procedural dismissal.

Architect

Architecture · Uzbekistan

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2025-02-25
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the EB-2 classification. For the advanced degree professional category, the petitioner lacked five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, with employment letters missing specific dates and duties. For the exceptional ability category, the petitioner only met one of the six criteria (official academic record) and failed to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience or recognition for significant contributions to the field beyond personal accomplishments, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B) and (F).

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-2 NIW petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-08-14.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 0 / 3

EB-2 (NIW) Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 3,816
Success Rate 53.6%
Sustained 2,046
Dismissed 1,674

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist