Architect

The petitioner, an architect, seeks to work in the United States within her field of specialty. The specific details of her proposed research or work focus were not discussed in the decision due to the procedural dismissal.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the EB-2 classification. For the advanced degree professional category, the petitioner lacked five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, with employment letters missing specific dates and duties. For the exceptional ability category, the petitioner only met one of the six criteria (official academic record) and failed to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience or recognition for significant contributions to the field beyond personal accomplishments, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B) and (F).

The petitioner, an entrepreneur, seeks to work in the United States within an unspecified field of business. The record does not provide specific details regarding the research area, methodologies, or intended impact of the endeavor beyond the petitioner's status as an entrepreneur.

The petitioner seeks to work as an entrepreneur in the United States. Specific details regarding the research area, methodologies, or intended impact of the endeavor were not discussed in the decision as it focused on procedural signature validity.