Aviation Maintenance Specialist

The Petitioner, an aircraft maintenance specialist, proposed to work in the United States in the field of aviation and aircraft maintenance. The endeavor involved maintaining and repairing avionics electronics systems, including instruments and computers that control engine, flight, navigation, and radio communications functions.

The Petitioner proposes to work in the United States as an aircraft mechanic. The endeavor focuses on providing maintenance services for aircraft to ensure safety and operational standards within the aviation industry.

The Petitioner, a helicopter pilot and flight instructor, seeks to continue his career in the United States. The record does not provide a specific detailed project beyond general employment in his field of expertise.

The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The Petitioner only satisfied two of the six initial evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability, specifically failing to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience in the occupation (as prior experience as a transportation manager and operation technician was not considered 'in the occupation'), membership in professional associations (as defined by regulation, not online dictionaries), and significant contributions to the industry. The arguments presented were re-evaluations of previously considered claims without new evidence or legal basis.