dismissed EB-2 (NIW)

Aircraft Maintenance Technician

Aircraft Maintenance Technician · 2024-12-10

Decision Date
2024-12-10
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The Petitioner only satisfied two of the six initial evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability, specifically failing to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience in the occupation (as prior experience as a transportation manager and operation technician was not considered 'in the occupation'), membership in professional associations (as defined by regulation, not online dictionaries), and significant contributions to the industry. The arguments presented were re-evaluations of previously considered claims without new evidence or legal basis.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Professional Memberships
Original Contributions

Similar Cases

Aircraft Mechanic

Aerospace · Brazil

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2024-07-25
The Petitioner seeks to work as an aircraft maintenance technician in the United States. The endeavor involves performing maintenance and technical operations within the aviation industry to ensure aircraft safety and functionality.

Aircraft Mechanic

Aerospace · Venezuela

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) rfe dismissed
Venezuela 2023-07-20
The Petitioner proposed to work as an aircraft maintenance technician, focusing on maintenance functions including removal and installation of aircraft components and non-destructive testing (NDT) on aircraft structures and engines. He intended to operate a commercial office for his Venezuelan company to serve airlines and FAA repair stations in the United States.
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2025-01-10
The petitioner proposes to continue his work as an aircraft maintenance technician, focusing on improving operational and safety standards within the aviation field.
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2024-08-21
The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed. The motion to reopen failed because the petitioner did not identify new facts or submit documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider failed because the petitioner did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The AAO affirmed that the petitioner did not meet three of the six required criteria for exceptional ability, specifically failing to prove PAMA is a professional association under regulatory definition and failing to demonstrate significant contributions to the aviation mechanics industry. The criterion for ten years of full-time experience was waived as not discussed in detail on motion.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-2 NIW petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-12-10.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Evidence Types 2

EB-2 (NIW) Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 3,895
Success Rate 54.2%
Sustained 2,112
Dismissed 1,687

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist