Singer
Singer · 2022-03-10
Framework Evaluation
2 of 3 criteria metThe Director determined that the Petitioner satisfied the criterion relating to judging.
The AAO determined that the Petitioner demonstrated her eligibility for the display criterion.
The AAO concluded that the Petitioner did not establish that she met the published material criterion on appeal.
The Petitioner failed to specifically identify errors regarding this criterion on appeal, leading it to be considered abandoned.
The Petitioner did not provide specific allegations of error regarding original contributions of major significance on appeal.
This criterion was considered abandoned as the Petitioner did not contest the Director's negative finding on appeal.
The Petitioner made no specific allegation of error regarding the high salary criterion on appeal.
Why This Petition Was Denied
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe Director requested evidence for seven categories; the Petitioner responded maintaining eligibility for all, but only judging was initially accepted.
Evidence
- Judging (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv))
- Display (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii))
- Published material (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) - submitted but found unmet
- Awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) - claimed but abandoned
- Original contributions of major significance (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v)) - claimed but abandoned
- Leading or critical role (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(viii)) - claimed but abandoned
- High salary (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ix)) - claimed but abandoned
Similar Cases
Musician
Music · China
Musician
Performing Arts · Bangladesh
Musician
Performing Arts · Bangladesh
Musician
Music
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2022-03-10.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist