remanded EB-1A
Singer
Singer · Bangladesh · 2024-08-13
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
3 of 3 criteria metDisplay of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases (Met)
The Director determined the petitioner met this criterion by providing evidence that she has displayed her work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence (Met)
The petitioner received a Best Singer Award in 2021 in Bangladesh, which the AAO concluded qualifies as a nationally recognized award for excellence in her field.
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media (Met)
The petitioner submitted published newspaper articles about her in daily newspapers that qualify as major media in Bangladesh, supported by circulation figures and credible rankings.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
The AAO determined the Director erred in evaluating the awards criterion, finding the 'Best Singer Award' received in 2021 in Bangladesh qualified as a nationally recognized award. The AAO also found the Director erred regarding the published material criterion, as the petitioner provided sufficient evidence, including circulation figures from the Government of Bangladesh and credible rankings, to establish that articles about her were published in major media in Bangladesh. With these two additional criteria met, the petitioner satisfied the initial evidence requirements of three criteria, necessitating a remand for a final merits determination.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Awards
Media Coverage
Exhibitions
Evidence Submitted
- displayed her work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
- received a Best Singer Award from the ______________________ in 2021
- published newspaper articles about her and her work as a singer in major media in Bangladesh
Similar Cases
Musician
Performing Arts · Bangladesh
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-10-10
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the required three out of ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the awards presented were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. Memberships in associations did not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. Published material lacked author identification and proper translation certification, and some articles were not about the Petitioner. Evidence for high salary and commercial successes was insufficient, lacking objective compensation data, valid comparative sampling, or volume of sales/box office receipts, and some evidence post-dated the petition filing.
Musician
Music · China
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
California 2024-07-26
The Petitioner failed to meet any of the claimed criteria, including awards, memberships, and published material. Specifically, the Petitioner did not provide circulation data for media, evidence of outstanding achievement for memberships, or proof of national/international recognition for prizes. The AAO also noted that the Petitioner's council membership had lapsed and new evidence was submitted after the filing date.
Others
Entertainment
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2022-03-10
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify specific legal or factual errors in the prior decision regarding the abandoned criteria. The Petitioner only met 2 of the 10 criteria (judging and display), falling short of the minimum requirement of 3.
Musician
Music
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-08-08
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that she is among the small percentage at the very top of her field. While the Director found three criteria met (published material, scholarly articles, and display of work), the awards presented were not established as nationally or internationally recognized, and scholarships were deemed academic training rather than qualifying awards. The Petitioner's appeal brief also failed to adequately address the specific shortcomings identified in the Director's final merits determination, leading to those issues being considered waived.
Frequently Asked Questions
A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-08-13.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome remanded
Criteria Met 3 / 3
Evidence Types 3
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist