dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Salsa Dancer, Choreographer And Instructor

Salsa Dancing, Choreography And Instruction · Colombia · 2024-07-10

Decision Date
2024-07-10
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Judging the Work of Others (Met)

The Director and AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's participation as a judge in various salsa festivals and competitions.

Display of Work at Artistic Exhibitions (Met)

The record demonstrated that the Petitioner displayed her work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Lesser Nationally or Internationally Recognized Prizes or Awards (Not Met)

Awards were granted to the dance team as a whole rather than the Petitioner individually, and the significance of the awarding bodies was not established.

Memberships in Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievements (Not Met)

The associations listed did not require outstanding achievements for membership as judged by national or international experts.

Published Material About the Alien (Not Met)

Articles lacked publication names, circulation data, or were not primarily about the Petitioner's professional work.

Original Contributions of Major Significance (Not Met)

Evidence did not detail how the Petitioner's work remarkably impacted or influenced the field of salsa dancing as a whole.

Leading or Critical Role (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that her roles were critical to the outcome of organizations with a distinguished reputation; the claim was waived on appeal.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner only satisfied two of the ten EB-1A criteria (judging and artistic exhibitions). Evidence for awards was deemed insufficient as they were team-based rather than individual, and published materials lacked circulation data or were not primarily about the Petitioner's work.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence to satisfy at least two additional criteria beyond artistic exhibitions. The Petitioner provided more documentation on awards and media, but it failed to meet the regulatory standards.

RFE Targets
Lesser Nationally or Internationally Recognized Prizes or AwardsMemberships in Associations Requiring Outstanding AchievementsPublished Material About the Alien

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Media Coverage
Professional Memberships
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Exhibitions
Leading Role
Evidence Submitted
  • Judging of various salsa dancing festivals and competitions
  • Display of work at artistic exhibitions and dance exhibitions
  • Performance with various dance companies world-wide
  • Founding and leadership of a dance school in Colombia
  • Articles in El Pais (2008) and 15 Minutos (2016)

Similar Cases

Choreographer

Performing Arts · Colombia

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-02-13
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the new evidence did not establish eligibility under at least three of the ten EB-1A criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner failed to prove membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements due to inconsistent documentation and lack of bylaws, published material in major media due to insufficient evidence of circulation or audience, and original contributions of major significance due to vague recommendation letters lacking specific details on the impact of contributions. The motion to reconsider was dismissed as the Petitioner did not demonstrate an incorrect application of law or policy in the prior decision, nor did she identify specific errors or explain how the prior decision did not follow regulations and policy guidance.

Coach

Performing Arts · Ukraine

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-12-20
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that they met the criteria for lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) and participation as a judge of the work of others (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv)). For awards, the evidence presented was deemed regional, local, or employer-based, lacking national or international recognition. For judging, the evidence consisted of a vague letter and an inconsistent website printout, failing to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Even if the Petitioner had met the other two claimed criteria (published material and artistic exhibitions), they would still not have met the minimum three criteria required.

Choreographer

Performing Arts · Belarus

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-01-31
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence requirements by not satisfying at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner only met two criteria: receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (i) and participating as a judge of the work of others (iv). The AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence for membership in associations (ii), published materials about her (iii), original contributions of major significance (v), performing in leading or critical roles (viii), or commanding a high salary (ix). The evidence for published material (YouTube videos) lacked proof of major media status, and salary data was not comparable or contemporaneous.

Choreographer

Performing Arts · China

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-09-13
The AAO found the Director erred by narrowly defining the Petitioner's field as 'performance dancing' instead of the broader field of 'dance,' which includes choreography and instruction. The AAO also determined the Director improperly disregarded the Petitioner's English statement of intent and later evidence of establishing a dance studio, as these activities align with the broader field of dance. The Petitioner satisfied the 'awards' criterion with a nationally recognized second prize from a 2011 Chinese government-sponsored dance competition and the 'judging' criterion by providing review notes from a world dance competition where she served as a judge.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-07-10.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 7

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist