dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued
Dancer And Dance Instructor
Dancer And Dance Instructor · Ukraine · 2024-12-20
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
0 of 3 criteria metRecipient of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (Not Met)
The Petitioner's awards were deemed regional, local, or employer-based, and youth-level awards from Ukraine lacked sufficient evidence of national or international recognition. The national scope of competitions does not equate to national or international recognition of the awards themselves.
Participation as a judge of the work of others (Not Met)
The evidence provided, a vague letter from an event organizer and an inconsistent website printout, lacked specific details (e.g., names of individuals judged, dates of judging) and corroborating evidence (e.g., candidate evaluation records), failing to meet the preponderance of evidence standard.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that they met the criteria for lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) and participation as a judge of the work of others (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv)). For awards, the evidence presented was deemed regional, local, or employer-based, lacking national or international recognition. For judging, the evidence consisted of a vague letter and an inconsistent website printout, failing to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Even if the Petitioner had met the other two claimed criteria (published material and artistic exhibitions), they would still not have met the minimum three criteria required.
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe RFE requested evidence regarding the Petitioner's awards. The Petitioner's response did not include additional evidence concerning youth-level awards from Ukraine and failed to establish the national or international recognition of other claimed awards.
RFE Targets
Recipient of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Evidence
Evidence Types
Awards
Judging Experience
Media Coverage
Evidence Submitted
- awards in the United States and Ukraine (local/regional/employer-based)
- awards earned in Ukraine in youth or junior competitions (as an amateur)
- participation in 'national scope' competitions (e.g., I the I I and the I )
- support letters confirming participation and first place in the I I
- letter from Mr. I I regarding judging at the I 2020 international dance competition
- printout of the I 2020 competition's homepage
Similar Cases
Choreographer
Performing Arts · China
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-09-13
The AAO found the Director erred by narrowly defining the Petitioner's field as 'performance dancing' instead of the broader field of 'dance,' which includes choreography and instruction. The AAO also determined the Director improperly disregarded the Petitioner's English statement of intent and later evidence of establishing a dance studio, as these activities align with the broader field of dance. The Petitioner satisfied the 'awards' criterion with a nationally recognized second prize from a 2011 Chinese government-sponsored dance competition and the 'judging' criterion by providing review notes from a world dance competition where she served as a judge.
Choreographer
Performing Arts · Belarus
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-01-31
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence requirements by not satisfying at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner only met two criteria: receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (i) and participating as a judge of the work of others (iv). The AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence for membership in associations (ii), published materials about her (iii), original contributions of major significance (v), performing in leading or critical roles (viii), or commanding a high salary (ix). The evidence for published material (YouTube videos) lacked proof of major media status, and salary data was not comparable or contemporaneous.
Others
Performing Arts
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-05-06
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish sustained acclaim, as there was no evidence of performances, awards, or media coverage for over eight years prior to filing. While she met the initial three-criteria threshold, the final merits determination found she was not among the small percentage at the top of the field due to her transition into studying Chinese medicine and the lack of recent professional achievements.
Others
Art and Design
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-06-17
The Petitioner failed to meet the required three out of ten criteria, only satisfying the judging criterion. Evidence for published material was rejected because circulation data was sourced from unreliable Wikipedia entries or self-serving Facebook claims. The leading or critical role criterion was not met because the evidence pertained to activities after the priority date.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-12-20.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 3
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist