dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Open World Game Design Lead

Electronics Company That Develops Video Games And Manufactures Gaming Systems · France · 2025-01-28

Decision Date
2025-01-28
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation (Met)

The Director and AAO agreed that the beneficiary satisfied this criterion by holding influential positions with major video game developers.

High salary or other significantly high remuneration for services (Met)

The AAO concluded that the petitioner satisfied this criterion, indicating the beneficiary received high remuneration for services.

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence (Not Met)

The beneficiary worked on award-winning projects but was not personally named as a recipient of any awards, which is required by the regulation.

Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media (Not Met)

The submitted articles were not sufficiently shown to be from major trade/professional publications or major media, and some did not substantially discuss the beneficiary's work.

Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field (Not Met)

The petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary's contributions had major significance to the broader field of video game design, beyond their importance to specific employers or projects.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten EB-1A criteria. The 'Prizes or Awards' criterion was not met as the beneficiary did not personally receive awards, only worked on award-winning projects. The 'Published Material' criterion was not met because the publications were not shown to be major trade/professional publications and did not substantially discuss the beneficiary's work. The 'Original Contributions' criterion was not met as the major significance of the contributions to the broader field (beyond the employer) was not established. Only 'Leading or Critical Role' and 'High Remuneration' were found to be met, falling short of the required three criteria.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence of the beneficiary's personal receipt of awards, not just participation in award-winning projects. It also sought proof that published materials were from major media, including circulation data, and evidence of the major significance and field-wide impact of the beneficiary's original contributions. The petitioner responded by reiterating that individual awards are uncommon in the industry, providing social media follower statistics for publications, and asserting the widespread adoption of the beneficiary's design principles without sufficient corroboration.

RFE Targets
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellencePublished material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major mediaOriginal scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field

Evidence

Evidence Types
Reference Letters Dependent
Published Material
High Salary
Evidence Submitted
  • participation in award-winning video game projects
  • online articles identifying beneficiary by name and title
  • testimonial letters from industry experts
  • evidence of high remuneration for services

Similar Cases

Others

Entertainment

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-08-14
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to provide evidence of individual awards, failed to establish the standing of publications as major media, and did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's participation as a judge of others' work with specific details. Additionally, the Petitioner did not provide comparable salary evidence for an 'Environment Concept Art Lead' position, instead offering data for less senior roles. The comparable evidence argument was also rejected as it referenced O-1 nonimmigrant criteria without proper justification for EB-1A.

Entrepreneur

Information Technology

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-12-26
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the case because the Director's analysis was insufficient. The decision did not adequately explain the reasons for concluding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy five claimed criteria (lesser awards, published materials, original contributions, leading or critical role, and high salary), nor did it discuss the evidence submitted in response to the RFE. The Director's analysis regarding the Petitioner's intent to continue working was also found to be copied verbatim from the RFE, indicating a lack of proper evaluation of the submitted evidence.

Software Engineer

Entertainment · Canada

USCIS EB-1A remanded
2024-07-23
The Petitioner satisfied the original contributions criterion by providing evidence of the Beneficiary's innovations in a 2005 role-playing game that influenced industry standards for physics modeling and camera collision detection. The Director's previous denial was withdrawn because the Beneficiary now meets three initial criteria: leading/critical role, high salary, and original contributions. A final merits determination is required to assess sustained national or international acclaim.

Director

Media · China

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
California 2024-09-16
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary requirements, establishing only one of the ten criteria (leading or critical role) instead of the required three. Specific criteria like awards, memberships, published material, judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, exhibitions, and high salary were not met due to issues such as awards given to the employer, job duties not qualifying as judging, lack of full English translations for articles, contributions not proven to be of major significance, and insufficient comparative wage data for the high salary claim. The AAO concluded the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner was among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-01-28.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 3

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist