Open World Game Design Lead
Electronics Company That Develops Video Games And Manufactures Gaming Systems · France · 2025-01-28
Framework Evaluation
2 of 3 criteria metThe Director and AAO agreed that the beneficiary satisfied this criterion by holding influential positions with major video game developers.
The AAO concluded that the petitioner satisfied this criterion, indicating the beneficiary received high remuneration for services.
The beneficiary worked on award-winning projects but was not personally named as a recipient of any awards, which is required by the regulation.
The submitted articles were not sufficiently shown to be from major trade/professional publications or major media, and some did not substantially discuss the beneficiary's work.
The petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary's contributions had major significance to the broader field of video game design, beyond their importance to specific employers or projects.
Why This Petition Was Denied
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe RFE requested evidence of the beneficiary's personal receipt of awards, not just participation in award-winning projects. It also sought proof that published materials were from major media, including circulation data, and evidence of the major significance and field-wide impact of the beneficiary's original contributions. The petitioner responded by reiterating that individual awards are uncommon in the industry, providing social media follower statistics for publications, and asserting the widespread adoption of the beneficiary's design principles without sufficient corroboration.
Evidence
- participation in award-winning video game projects
- online articles identifying beneficiary by name and title
- testimonial letters from industry experts
- evidence of high remuneration for services
Similar Cases
Others
Entertainment
Entrepreneur
Information Technology
Software Engineer
Entertainment · Canada
Director
Media · China
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-01-28.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist