dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Chief Creative Officer And Partner

Design And Marketing Executive Specializing In The Area Of Aircraft Livery · 2024-06-06

Decision Date
2024-06-06
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Judging the work of others (Met)

The Director found that the Petitioner met the criterion relating to his participation as a judge of the work of others in his field.

Artistic exhibitions or showcases (Met)

The Director found that the Petitioner met the criterion relating to the display of his work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements (Not Met)

Membership in RGD was found to be based on professional competence and experience rather than outstanding achievements judged by experts.

Published material about the alien (Not Met)

While articles were about the Petitioner, the evidence failed to establish that the publications (websites) qualified as major trade or major media.

Leading or critical role (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's negative finding on this criterion, so it was considered waived.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of the ten EB-1A criteria. The RGD membership was found to reflect professional competence rather than outstanding achievement, and the submitted articles (e.g., Business Insider, Aviation Week) lacked sufficient context to be classified as major trade or professional media. Consequently, the Petitioner did not establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence that the publications featuring the Petitioner's work were major media; the Petitioner provided SimilarWeb data which the AAO found lacked sufficient context.

RFE Targets
Published material about the alien

Evidence

Evidence Types
Judging Experience
Exhibitions
Published Material
Professional Memberships
Evidence Submitted
  • Participation as a judge of the work of others in the field
  • Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
  • Membership in the Association of Registered Graphic Designers (RGD)
  • Articles in businessinsider.com, cnet.com, wearefinn.com, aviationweek.com
  • Interview in the 1/2023 edition of Metropolitan Airport News

Similar Cases

Marketing Manager

Marketing and Advertising · China

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-02-03
The motions were dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. Specific reasons included: the Summit Creative Award was given to the company, not the individual; published materials about the Petitioner lacked complete translations and did not pertain to his field; judging roles were everyday business decisions, not formal judging; original contributions lacked major significance; membership in associations was for an ad hoc panel, not a permanent association; scholarly articles were a speech, not a published article; and artistic exhibitions were not shown to be in the field of media and communication. The Petitioner only met one of the required three evidentiary criteria.

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Information Technology

USCIS EB-1A remanded
2024-06-07
The case was remanded because the Director's final merits analysis was insufficient and failed to address the evidence in its totality. Specifically, the Director did not adequately evaluate the Petitioner's awards, professional memberships, and contributions to the field when determining if he had sustained national or international acclaim.

Makeup Artist

Cosmetics

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-08-06
The Director's decision was withdrawn and the matter remanded because the decision did not adequately address the Petitioner's claims and evidence regarding the judging criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv)) and failed to consider the Petitioner's RFE response for the exhibition criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii)). The AAO found the decision insufficient for review, preventing a fair opportunity to contest on appeal.

Director

Media · China

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
California 2024-09-16
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary requirements, establishing only one of the ten criteria (leading or critical role) instead of the required three. Specific criteria like awards, memberships, published material, judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, exhibitions, and high salary were not met due to issues such as awards given to the employer, job duties not qualifying as judging, lack of full English translations for articles, contributions not proven to be of major significance, and insufficient comparative wage data for the high salary claim. The AAO concluded the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner was among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-06-06.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 4

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 884
Success Rate 52.7%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 301

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist