dismissed EB-1A
Barista
Barista · 2024-07-03
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
2 of 3 criteria metPublished Material (Not Met)
The Petitioner submitted information about the website Sprudge, but failed to provide context for visitor statistics or prove the site qualifies as major media.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The motion did not meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(ii) as it failed to address the latest decision in the proceeding. Substantively, the evidence regarding 'Sprudge' was insufficient to satisfy the published material criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) because the Petitioner failed to contextualize website traffic statistics or prove it constituted major media. The Petitioner only met 2 of the 10 required criteria.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Published Material
Evidence Submitted
- Website printouts and documents regarding Sprudge (submitted for published materials criterion)
Similar Cases
Others
Food and Beverage · Iran
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2022-05-05
The Petitioner met only two criteria (prizes and judging) but failed to satisfy a third. The 'Sprudge' articles were not shown to be in major media, and the high salary claim lacked comparative evidence. The new evidence regarding membership in a board of directors was rejected because it post-dated the 2016 filing date and did not demonstrate a requirement for outstanding achievements.
Marketing Manager
Consulting
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-11-26
The AAO remanded the case because the Director failed to adequately explain reasons for denial, did not fully discuss the contents of submitted documents, and mischaracterized evidence. Specifically, the Director incorrectly dismissed evidence for the lead or critical role criterion, mischaracterized membership evidence from the Eastern European Marketing Association, and incorrectly dismissed published materials by stating they were not professional publications and misapplying legal precedent regarding circulation data.
Athlete
Sports · Brazil
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-03-31
The Petitioner failed to respond to specific evidentiary shortcomings identified in an RFE, rendering those arguments procedurally barred on appeal. Substantively, the record lacked evidence of a one-time major achievement or documentation satisfying at least three of the ten EB-1A criteria. The Petitioner did not demonstrate being part of the small percentage at the very top of the field or having a career of acclaimed work.
Others
Food and Beverage
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
California 2024-08-27
The Director's decision was withdrawn and remanded because it was insufficient for review. The Director failed to acknowledge or discuss evidence and arguments provided in response to an RFE for criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i), (v), and (viii). Additionally, the decision contained few specific references to the submitted evidence or the Petitioner's explanations, and improperly dismissed evidence from 'unreliable' sources without sufficient support.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-07-03.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 1
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist