dismissed EB-1A

Barista

Barista / Cafe Owner · Iran · 2022-05-05

Decision Date
2022-05-05
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (Met)

The Director concluded that the Petitioner met the criterion relating to prizes.

Participation as a judge of the work of others (Met)

The Director concluded that the Petitioner met the criterion relating to participation as a judge.

Published material about the individual in professional or major media (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to provide circulation figures or evidence that 'Sprudge' qualifies as major media beyond self-serving promotional descriptions.

High salary or remuneration in relation to others in the field (Not Met)

The Petitioner documented cafe income but did not provide comparative evidence to show it was high relative to other baristas or cafe owners.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements (Not Met)

The evidence post-dated the filing date and did not establish that the association required outstanding achievements judged by experts.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner met only two criteria (prizes and judging) but failed to satisfy a third. The 'Sprudge' articles were not shown to be in major media, and the high salary claim lacked comparative evidence. The new evidence regarding membership in a board of directors was rejected because it post-dated the 2016 filing date and did not demonstrate a requirement for outstanding achievements.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Judging Experience
Media Coverage
High Salary
Professional Memberships
Evidence Submitted
  • Participation as a judge of the work of others
  • Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes
  • Articles in Sprudge (coffee blog)
  • Total income documentation for a cafe in Iran (2009-2014)
  • Appointment letter as education and research director (September 2020)

Similar Cases

Others

Food and Beverage

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-07-03
The motion did not meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(ii) as it failed to address the latest decision in the proceeding. Substantively, the evidence regarding 'Sprudge' was insufficient to satisfy the published material criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) because the Petitioner failed to contextualize website traffic statistics or prove it constituted major media. The Petitioner only met 2 of the 10 required criteria.

Chef

Food and Beverage · Russia

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
Nebraska 2024-08-06
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria. Specifically, the evidence for original contributions lacked probative value due to identical language in letters, and the 'BBQ Cake Tutorial' was not considered a scholarly article for learned persons.

Others

Broadcasting

USCIS EB-1A remanded
2025-03-18
The Director's decision was withdrawn because it improperly evaluated whether the evidence established 'sustained national or international acclaim' within the individual criteria analysis. Under the Kazarian framework, this evaluation belongs in the final merits determination, not the initial counting of criteria. The matter is remanded for a proper de novo review of the four claimed criteria: awards, published material, judging, and high salary.

Musician

Music · China

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
California 2024-07-26
The Petitioner failed to meet any of the claimed criteria, including awards, memberships, and published material. Specifically, the Petitioner did not provide circulation data for media, evidence of outstanding achievement for memberships, or proof of national/international recognition for prizes. The AAO also noted that the Petitioner's council membership had lapsed and new evidence was submitted after the filing date.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2022-05-05.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist