dismissed EB-1A
Chief Executive
Aquaculture Industry · China · 2024-12-20
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
1 of 3 criteria metPublished material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien's work in the field (Met)
The AAO concluded that the Petitioner satisfied the published material criterion.
Major, internationally recognized awards (Not Met)
The Petitioner did not indicate or establish that he has received a major, internationally recognized award.
Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field (Not Met)
The Petitioner's claimed contributions in aquaculture, while original to China, were not considered original or of major significance to the broader international aquaculture field, as similar devices and methods existed elsewhere prior to his efforts.
Authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media (Not Met)
The Petitioner's provided articles from 1998 and 2006 were in fields (materials science, computer graphics) unrelated to his stated field of endeavor, aquaculture, and thus did not satisfy this criterion.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the EB-1A classification. The AAO found that the Petitioner did not meet the requirement of a major, internationally recognized award. Regarding the ten regulatory criteria, the AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner only satisfied one criterion (published material). The Petitioner's claims for 'original contributions of major significance' were rejected because his patents and advancements in aquaculture in China were not considered original to the broader international field, with similar technologies existing prior to his involvement. His 'authorship of scholarly articles' criterion was also rejected as the articles (from 1998 and 2006) were in fields (materials science, computer graphics) unrelated to aquaculture, his stated field of endeavor for the U.S. petition. Therefore, the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum three criteria.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Patents
Reference Letters Dependent
Published Material
Scholarly Articles
Evidence Submitted
- patents (aquaculture industry)
- letters from Mr. O (regarding aquaculture technology adoption in China)
- published material (general, not field-specific)
- scholarly articles (materials science, computer graphics)
Similar Cases
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Software
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-02-03
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field, as required by section 203(b)(1)(A) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(2). The Petitioner's evidence, including two textbooks with 5,900 copies sold and a proposed acquisition offer of $1 million for his company, was deemed insufficient to establish the required level of acclaim or preeminence compared to others in the field. USCIS also noted the lack of objective documentation for the significance of his company's vendor status and the unproven nature of the acquisition.
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Food and Beverage · Colombia
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
Texas 2024-07-18
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner only satisfied one criterion (published materials) instead of the required three. Specifically, the awards submitted (e.g., Entrepreneurial Spirit 2012, H-E-B Quest for Texas Best) lacked evidence of national or international significance, and roles with the Association of Caribbean States and United Nations were not proven to be leading or critical.
General Manager
Printing and Publishing · China
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2023-11-28
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner only met two criteria: scholarly articles and published material. The 'original contributions' criterion was not met as patents alone do not prove major significance without evidence of widespread industry adoption. The 'high remuneration' criterion failed because the Petitioner's total compensation (salary plus bonuses) was compared against industry averages of base salary only, preventing a valid comparison. Additionally, the 'leading or critical role' and 'membership' criteria were not satisfied due to lack of evidence regarding the organizations' distinguished reputations and the nature of the Petitioner's individual membership.
Environmental Engineer
Environmental Services · Turkey
USCIS EB-1A remanded
2024-11-27
The Director denied the petition because the Petitioner only met two of the ten EB-1A criteria. However, the AAO found that the Petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance, bringing the total to three criteria met (published material about the Petitioner, original contributions of major significance, and authorship of scholarly articles). The AAO withdrew the denial and remanded the case for a final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-12-20.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 1 / 3
Evidence Types 4
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist