remanded EB-1A

Water Treatment Specialist

Water Treatment Specialist · Turkey · 2024-11-27

Decision Date
2024-11-27
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

3 of 3 criteria met
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media (Met)

The Director determined, and the AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner met this criterion based on published material about him.

Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field (Met)

The AAO concluded the Petitioner met this criterion by introducing Turkey's first membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment system and developing a pool operator training program adopted nationally, both deemed contributions of major significance.

Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media (Met)

The Director determined, and the AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner met this criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The Director denied the petition because the Petitioner only met two of the ten EB-1A criteria. However, the AAO found that the Petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance, bringing the total to three criteria met (published material about the Petitioner, original contributions of major significance, and authorship of scholarly articles). The AAO withdrew the denial and remanded the case for a final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Peer Reviewed Publications
Media Coverage
Reference Letters Independent
Reference Letters Dependent
Original Contributions
Evidence Submitted
  • Introduction of Turkey's first membrane bioreactor (MBR) wastewater treatment system
  • Development of a solution for membrane tears in MBR systems, now used nationwide
  • Development of a pool operator training program that became the basis for a national required certification program by Turkey's health and education ministries
  • Detailed letters from experts in the field and former colleagues/clients discussing the Petitioner's work and contributions
  • Documentation crediting the Petitioner's company with the initial iteration of the pool operator training program

Similar Cases

Research Engineer

Environmental Services · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Texas 7 days 2024-05-24
The petition was approved based on meeting at least three EB-1A criteria: authorship of 7 scholarly articles, 339 citations demonstrating the original significance of his research, and participation as a judge of others' work through 10 peer reviews and 5 NSF grant reviews. The case was further strengthened by evidence of his work's impact on environmental risks and water treatment in the U.S.

Research Scientist

Environmental Services · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
New York 398 days 2025-05-09
The petition was approved based on 10 peer-reviewed journal articles in top-tier publications like Environmental Science & Technology and over 537 citations. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through an h-index of 9, placing them in the top 4% of their field, and the completion of at least 16 peer reviews for high-impact journals. Additionally, the work was supported by major federal agencies including the NSF, DOE, and NASA.

Civil Engineer

Engineering · Iraq

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-10-04
The appeal is dismissed because the Petitioner failed to provide initial evidence of a one-time achievement or meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that his association memberships required outstanding achievements, that his original contributions (including published articles and citations) were of major significance to the field of water resources engineering, or that his roles were leading/critical for organizations with distinguished reputations. The AAO found the evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim, concluding the Petitioner is not among the small percentage at the very top of his field.

Assistant Professor

Engineering

WeGreened EB-1A approved
47 days 2024-07-23
The petitioner satisfied the EB-1A criteria through 24 peer-reviewed journal articles and abstracts in high-impact journals. Her work garnered over 499 citations, placing her papers among the most highly cited in her field. Additionally, she demonstrated her standing in the community by completing 122 peer reviews for professional publications.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-11-27.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
Criteria Met 3 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist