EB-1C for Pakistani Nationals

USCIS I-140 petition data for Pakistan nationals (FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)).

42 I-140 petitions 33 approved #9 by volume
View Dashboard

USCIS I-140 Data

Pakistan I-140 Petition Statistics

USCIS EB-1C petition data for Pakistan nationals. FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025).

I-140 Receipts

42

0.6% of all

I-140 Approvals

33

of 4,857 total

Volume Rank

#9

by I-140 receipts

Source: USCIS I-140 Performance Data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025). Receipts and approvals for the reporting quarter.

Wait Time Estimator

Estimate Your Green Card Timeline

Enter your priority date and country to get a personalized estimate based on average DOS Final Action Date advancement over the last 12 months.

EB-1

Sources: I-140/I-485 ranges from USCIS Processing Times, backlog advancement averaged over last 12 DOS Visa Bulletins. Estimates only.

Find Pakistani EB-1C Cases

Browse real petition decisions and case studies from Pakistan, or join the waitlist to get notified when personalized case matching launches.

Country Comparison

USCIS I-140 data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)

CountryReceiptsApprovals
Grand Total 3,7312,430
India 1,384872
China 352190
Pakistan (current)4233
Case Data Insights

We analyzed 1 publicly available EB-1C petition decision involving Pakistan nationals. Of these, 0% was approved or sustained, 1 denied. These cases span 1 industry and 1 job title. Explore the charts below to see how decision outcomes have trended over time and which industries and roles have the highest success rates.

Decision Trends

0122024-07
Approved
Remanded
Denied

Top Industries

Healthcare 1

Top Job Titles

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) 1

Policy Updates

Pakistan View all
Feb 2026 warning Executive Order
Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats

As a non-VWP country, Pakistan's EB-1C applicants will be subject to the maximum extent of CHRI access permitted by law. This likely results in more stringent security clearances that could delay the final adjudication of adjustment of status applications.

security screeningvetting
Jan 2026 info USCIS Alert
USCIS to Increase Premium Processing Fees

The fee hike increases the cost for Pakistani citizens utilizing the EB-1C category. Since the category is current for Pakistan, the impact is primarily on the cost of corporate relocation services.

processing-timefee-increase
Dec 2025 warning USCIS Memo
USCIS Increases Screening, Vetting of Aliens Working in U.S.

The policy update mandates a deeper look into how multinational companies are structured, which will likely increase the scrutiny on Pakistani firms establishing U.S. branches. This will result in longer processing times and higher documentation requirements.

processing timecorporate structure
Nov 2025 info USCIS Alert
USCIS Announces FY 2026 Inflation Increase for Certain Immigration-Related Fees

Pakistani applicants will experience the same fee hike as other global applicants. The change is purely financial and does not alter the eligibility or priority date availability for Pakistani nationals.

fee increase
Nov 2025 warning USCIS Alert
Court Order on Partial Stay of DHS 2024 USCIS Fee Rule

The stay on the fee rule ensures that the cost of filing Form I-140 remains at previous levels for the time being. This is beneficial for Pakistani applicants who may be sensitive to the rising costs of U.S. immigration procedures.

filing feesvisa processing

Frequently Asked Questions

At a Glance

USCIS Official Data

I-140 Receipts 42
I-140 Rank #9 of 191

Scraped Case Data

Decisions 1
Success Rate 0%
Country Share 1%
Approved / Sustained 0
Denied / Dismissed 1
Top Industry Healthcare
Top Job Title Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Recent Decisions

View all

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Healthcare · Pakistan

USCIS rfe dismissed
2024-07-18
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to resolve material discrepancies in ownership records with independent, objective evidence. Specifically, the Petitioner submitted conflicting operating agreements and tax forms regarding who held majority control of both the U.S. and foreign entities. Without consistent evidence of ownership and control, the Petitioner could not demonstrate a qualifying relationship as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(i)(2).