EB-1C for Nigerian Nationals

USCIS I-140 petition data for Nigeria nationals (FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)).

22 I-140 petitions 10 approved #10 by volume
View Dashboard

USCIS I-140 Data

Nigeria I-140 Petition Statistics

USCIS EB-1C petition data for Nigeria nationals. FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025).

I-140 Receipts

22

0.3% of all

I-140 Approvals

10

of 4,857 total

Volume Rank

#10

by I-140 receipts

Source: USCIS I-140 Performance Data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025). Receipts and approvals for the reporting quarter.

Wait Time Estimator

Estimate Your Green Card Timeline

Enter your priority date and country to get a personalized estimate based on average DOS Final Action Date advancement over the last 12 months.

EB-1

Sources: I-140/I-485 ranges from USCIS Processing Times, backlog advancement averaged over last 12 DOS Visa Bulletins. Estimates only.

Find Nigerian EB-1C Cases

Browse real petition decisions and case studies from Nigeria, or join the waitlist to get notified when personalized case matching launches.

Country Comparison

USCIS I-140 data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)

CountryReceiptsApprovals
Grand Total 3,7312,430
India 1,384872
China 352190
Nigeria (current)2210
Case Data Insights

We analyzed 1 publicly available EB-1C petition decision involving Nigeria nationals. Of these, 0% was approved or sustained, 1 denied. These cases span 1 industry and 1 job title. Explore the charts below to see how decision outcomes have trended over time and which industries and roles have the highest success rates.

Decision Trends

0122022-03
Approved
Remanded
Denied

Top Industries

Wholesale Trade 1

Top Job Titles

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) 1

Policy Updates

Nigeria View all
Feb 2026 warning Executive Order
Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats

Nigerian EB-1C applicants may face more intensive questioning regarding their background as DHS implements the order's mandate to protect against 'public safety threats.' The lack of a VWP-style reciprocal agreement may lead to longer manual verification periods.

vettingsecurity screening
Jan 2026 info USCIS Alert
USCIS to Increase Premium Processing Fees

The fee increase applies to all Nigerian multinational managers seeking to expedite their green card petitions. This change is purely financial as the EB-1 category for Nigeria does not currently face a backlog.

processing-timefee-increase
Dec 2025 critical Proclamation
Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States

Under Section 5(j) of the proclamation, the entry of Nigerian nationals as immigrants is suspended due to concerns regarding terrorist groups and vetting difficulties. This creates a total barrier for multinational managers or executives from Nigeria seeking to obtain permanent residency through the EB-1C category.

entry-banimmigrant-visa-suspensionvetting-deficiencies
Dec 2025 warning USCIS Memo
USCIS Increases Screening, Vetting of Aliens Working in U.S.

The increased vetting of corporate structures will require Nigerian applicants to provide exhaustive proof of the qualifying relationship between the Nigerian and U.S. entities. This may lead to delays in the I-140 adjudication process.

administrative processingvetting
Nov 2025 info USCIS Alert
USCIS Announces FY 2026 Inflation Increase for Certain Immigration-Related Fees

The impact on Nigerian applicants is limited to the increased cost of the I-140 petition. As there is no specific retrogression for Nigeria in the EB-1 category, the processing timeline remains unaffected.

fee increase

Frequently Asked Questions

At a Glance

USCIS Official Data

I-140 Receipts 22
I-140 Rank #10 of 191

Scraped Case Data

Decisions 1
Success Rate 0%
Country Share 1%
Approved / Sustained 0
Denied / Dismissed 1
Top Industry Wholesale Trade
Top Job Title Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Recent Decisions

View all

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Wholesale Trade · Nigeria

USCIS rfe dismissed
Texas 2022-03-09
The petitioner did not demonstrate that the beneficiary's duties would be primarily managerial rather than operational. The job descriptions provided were vague, focusing on discretionary authority rather than specific daily tasks, and included non-managerial duties such as attending networking events and communicating with suppliers. Furthermore, the petitioner failed to prove a qualifying relationship with the offshore entity providing support staff.