EB-1C for Australian Nationals

USCIS I-140 petition data for Australia nationals (FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)).

24 I-140 petitions 17 approved #47 by volume
View Dashboard

USCIS I-140 Data

Australia I-140 Petition Statistics

USCIS EB-1C petition data for Australia nationals. FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025).

I-140 Receipts

24

0.3% of all

I-140 Approvals

17

of 4,857 total

Volume Rank

#47

by I-140 receipts

Source: USCIS I-140 Performance Data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025). Receipts and approvals for the reporting quarter.

Wait Time Estimator

Estimate Your Green Card Timeline

Enter your priority date and country to get a personalized estimate based on average DOS Final Action Date advancement over the last 12 months.

EB-1

Sources: I-140/I-485 ranges from USCIS Processing Times, backlog advancement averaged over last 12 DOS Visa Bulletins. Estimates only.

Find Australian EB-1C Cases

Browse real petition decisions and case studies from Australia, or join the waitlist to get notified when personalized case matching launches.

Country Comparison

USCIS I-140 data, FY2025 Q4 (Jul-Sep 2025)

CountryReceiptsApprovals
Grand Total 3,7312,430
India 1,384872
China 352190
Australia (current)2417
Case Data Insights

We analyzed 1 publicly available EB-1C petition decision involving Australia nationals. Of these, 100% was approved or sustained. These cases span 1 industry. Explore the charts below to see how decision outcomes have trended over time and which industries and roles have the highest success rates.

Decision Trends

0122024-10
Approved
Remanded
Denied

Top Industries

Manufacturing 1

Policy Updates

General View all
Mar 2026 info Visa Bulletin

Visa Bulletin Update: EB-1 (2026-03)

The Department of State updated EB-1 Final Action Dates in the 2026-03 Visa Bulletin: - India: moved from 2023-02-01 to 2023-03-01 - China: moved from 2023-02-01 to 2023-03-01 This may allow additional applicants to proceed with their petitions.

advancementeb-1final-action-datepriority-date
Feb 2026 info Executive Order
Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats

By authorizing the exchange of felony conviction records with Visa Waiver Program countries and other allies, the order expands the information available to DHS for screening immigrants. This affects the background check phase for EB-1C petitions, particularly for those with significant international travel history.

vettingbackground checkssecurity screening
Jan 2026 warning USCIS Alert
USCIS to Increase Premium Processing Fees

USCIS has announced an inflation-based increase for premium processing fees, which applies to EB-1C petitions. This change increases the financial requirement for companies seeking to expedite the transfer of key personnel.

premium processinguscis feesform i-907inflation adjustment
Jan 2026 info Visa Bulletin

Visa Bulletin Update: EB-1 (2026-01)

The Department of State updated EB-1 Final Action Dates in the 2026-01 Visa Bulletin: - India: moved from 2022-03-15 to 2023-02-01 - China: moved from 2023-01-22 to 2023-02-01 This may allow additional applicants to proceed with their petitions.

advancementeb-1final-action-datepriority-date
Dec 2025 critical Proclamation
Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States

Multinational managers and executives from the listed countries are barred from entering the U.S. as immigrants. The policy targets countries with perceived vetting deficiencies, meaning EB-1C petitions for nationals of these countries cannot result in entry or visa issuance while the proclamation is in effect.

travel banimmigrant visas212(f)national security

Frequently Asked Questions

At a Glance

USCIS Official Data

I-140 Receipts 24
I-140 Rank #47 of 191

Scraped Case Data

Decisions 1
Success Rate 100%
Country Share 1%
Approved / Sustained 1
Denied / Dismissed 0
Top Industry Manufacturing

Recent Decisions

View all

Others

Manufacturing · Australia

USCIS rfe sustained
2024-10-11
The AAO sustained the appeal, finding that the plain language of the statute and regulations allows for direct employment of an 'unattached' foreign worker by a U.S. employer, provided all other eligibility requirements are met. The Beneficiary was continuously employed by the Petitioner's multinational organization for the required period in a managerial capacity, managing process engineering across U.S. and Asia sites with 75 direct and indirect reports. The Petitioner demonstrated the Beneficiary's role was primarily managerial, overseeing an essential function and exercising discretion over day-to-day operations.