All Cases

The approval was based on 15 peer-reviewed articles in top-ranked venues and 367 citations from scholars in 26 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed 40 peer reviews for journals with impact factors up to 18.6 and held leading roles in projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

The petition was approved based on 8 peer-reviewed publications (4 journal articles and 4 conference papers) which garnered 372 citations, ranking them among the most cited in the field. The petitioner also satisfied the judging criterion through 21 review assignments for top journals and conferences. Evidence of original contributions was supported by the adoption of his multi-fingered grasp planning models by major global institutions and funding from the National Science Foundation.

The petition was approved based on a record of 13 journal articles and 17 conference papers with 390 citations. The petitioner also demonstrated expertise through 42 peer reviews and secured research funding from prestigious agencies including NASA, AFOSR, and the NSF.

The petition was approved based on the petitioner's record of 1 peer-reviewed journal article, 8 conference articles, and 3 preprints in top robotics venues. A significant citation count of 624 demonstrated a major impact on the field. Additionally, the petitioner's 22 peer-review invitations for leading journals and conferences satisfied the judging criterion for EB-1A.

The petitioner submitted evidence of 32 conference papers, 7 peer-reviewed journal articles, and 5 preprints. He also demonstrated his expertise by conducting at least 30 peer reviews. The case was strengthened by his significant role in the field and the high applicability of his research to global robotics challenges.