All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary was employed abroad in a managerial or executive capacity for at least one year during the qualifying period. The record lacked a description of foreign duties, and the beneficiary's long-term presence in the U.S. as a visitor since 2015 constituted a disqualifying break in multinational employment. Additionally, the petitioner failed to document the beneficiary's nonimmigrant status and authorization to work in the U.S. at the time of filing.

The Petitioner failed to provide valid certified English translations for foreign language documents as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(iii). The motion to reopen did not state new facts or provide new documentary evidence, and the motion to reconsider failed to establish an incorrect application of law or policy in the prior decision.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's substantive grounds for denial, effectively waiving those issues. Furthermore, the Petitioner lacked a qualifying multinational relationship as it did not demonstrate operations outside the U.S., and the Beneficiary did not meet the requirement of one year of foreign employment within the three years preceding U.S. entry.