All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner provided only a generalized statement regarding its ability to pay without filing a supporting brief or specifying legal or factual errors. Under Matter of Valencia, such overly broad claims are insufficient to overturn a Director's decision.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date until the petition's approval. The organization's net revenues and net current assets were insufficient, and it did not provide proof of officers' agreements to forego compensation or their ability to financially support themselves on reduced wages.