All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not remedy documentary deficiencies identified in the RFE, specifically regarding incomplete translation certifications and employer letters lacking the writer's address. Furthermore, the Petitioner failed to provide enough consistent evidence and information to establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial capacity in the U.S., citing a vague job description and conflicting organizational charts.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to resolve material discrepancies in ownership records with independent, objective evidence. Specifically, the Petitioner submitted conflicting operating agreements and tax forms regarding who held majority control of both the U.S. and foreign entities. Without consistent evidence of ownership and control, the Petitioner could not demonstrate a qualifying relationship as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(i)(2).