All Cases

The initial appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered job. The subsequent motions to reopen and reconsider filed by the Petitioner's son were dismissed due to lack of standing. The Beneficiary's current motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because they exceeded the scope of the AAO's review, as they did not address the factual or legal correctness of the latest decision (which focused on the Petitioner's son's lack of standing).

The motions were dismissed because the Petitioner's son is not an 'affected party' with legal standing, as a sole proprietorship ceases to exist upon the death of the owner. Furthermore, the Beneficiary did not properly request to port the visa under INA Section 204(j) by failing to file Form I-485 Supplement J at the correct USCIS address.