All Cases

The Petitioner's 2022 tax return reflected a net income of $13,344 and net current assets of -$122,078, which failed to cover the wage deficit. Furthermore, the Petitioner did not meet the regulatory requirements for documenting the Beneficiary's experience under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii)(A).

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner's net income (-$2,517 and $2,947) and net current assets ($2,332 and $5,279) were significantly below the proffered wage. The totality of circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa did not support a favorable finding. Furthermore, the Petitioner failed to provide reliable evidence of the Beneficiary's required two years of full-time experience.