All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish the Beneficiary met at least three of the regulatory O-1 criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary would perform in leading roles in distinguished productions or events, nor did the provided articles reflect national or international recognition for achievements. The AAO did not need to review other criteria or the totality of the evidence as the initial evidentiary requirement was not met.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of the six regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability in the arts. Specifically, the published materials were not shown to be in 'major' publications, the testimonials did not come from recognized experts in photography, and there was no comparative evidence to prove a high salary. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to submit the required peer group or labor organization consultation.