All Cases

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not provide sufficient independent, objective evidence to corroborate the Beneficiary's claimed full-time work experience in Pakistan, which was necessary to meet the 24 months of required experience. The Beneficiary's prior U.S. visitor visa application, where he stated no previous employment, created an inconsistency that required more than just employer letters to resolve.

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to resolve inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's work history with independent objective evidence. Consequently, the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required 24 months of experience as a jewelry repairer. While findings of willful misrepresentation and the invalidation of the labor certification were withdrawn, the lack of proven qualifications warranted the denial.

The appeal was dismissed because the facts stated in the petition regarding the Beneficiary's education were found to be untrue, constituting willful material misrepresentation. The omission of the Beneficiary's actual college education also cut off a line of inquiry into the authenticity of his job experience. Furthermore, the Petitioner did not provide required financial evidence to demonstrate the ability to pay the proffered wage for years following 2019.