remanded EB-3

Sales Associate/Business Assistant

Retail Business · 2025-03-06

Decision Date
2025-03-06
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of criteria met
Beneficiary's Education Credentials (Met)

The Petitioner established that the Beneficiary meets the minimum education requirements for the offered position by submitting academic records and an evaluation report on appeal.

Employer's Ability to Pay Proffered Wage (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not establish its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage based on net income or net current assets for 2022. The Director also failed to consider the totality of the circumstances, including prior years' revenues and other Sonegawa factors.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The Director's decision was withdrawn and the matter remanded because USCIS failed to issue an RFE or NOID, denying the Petitioner an opportunity to submit additional evidence. The Director also did not fully consider the totality of the circumstances regarding the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage, as required by Matter of Sonegawa. The case requires further review of the evidence and a new decision.

Similar Cases

Others

Education

USCIS EB-3 remanded
2024-08-27
The Director's decision was based on the Petitioner's perceived inability to pay the proffered wage. The AAO withdrew this decision, finding the Petitioner did demonstrate ability to pay for 2022. However, the case was remanded because the record lacked evidence of ability to pay for 2023 and 2024, which is required for continuing eligibility.

Accountant

Consulting · South Korea

USCIS EB-3 rfe dismissed
Georgia 2024-02-13
The motion to reopen failed to establish a valid successor-in-interest relationship due to inconsistent and unreliable documentation regarding the transfer of assets. Additionally, the Beneficiary did not demonstrate that his three-year foreign degree was equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree as required by the EB-3 professional category.

Medical Assistant

Pharmaceuticals

USCIS EB-3 dismissed
Nebraska 2024-06-05
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner presented no new facts supported by documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, merely reasserting previous arguments.

Assistant Manager

Jewelry · Pakistan

USCIS EB-3 remanded
2022-06-02
The AAO withdrew the revocation because the alleged misrepresentation was not supported, but remanded the case because the Petitioner failed to prove the Beneficiary held the required degree in 'business administration' and failed to provide 2017 financial documentation to prove ability to pay.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-3 petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-03-06.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
Criteria Met 1 /

EB-3 Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 109
Success Rate 9.2%
Sustained 10
Dismissed 64

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist