Crew Member
Operator Of Fast-Food Restaurants · Uzbekistan · 2025-02-21
Framework Evaluation
0 of 0 criteria metThe AAO found insufficient evidence to support the Director's finding that the Petitioner violated 20 C.F.R. § 656.12(b) or willfully concealed receipt of payment for labor certification activity, thus withdrawing the misrepresentation finding.
The Director's decision failed to explain the specific reasons for revoking the petition based on the company's purported lack of intent to employ the Beneficiary in the offered job on a permanent basis, leading to a remand for further explanation.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
Similar Cases
Others
Food and Beverage · South Korea
Others
Tourism
Others
Food and Beverage · Iran
Chef
Food and Beverage · Saudi Arabia
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-02-21.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-3 Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist