remanded EB-3 RFE Issued

Bookkeeper

Convenience Store · 2024-07-05

Decision Date
2024-07-05
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 1 criteria met
Bona Fide Job Opportunity (Partially Met)

USCIS questioned if the job was clearly open to U.S. workers due to a personal relationship between the owner and the Beneficiary's uncle.

Experience Documentation (Not Met)

The Director initially found the Petitioner failed to establish the Beneficiary had the required two years of work experience.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The AAO withdrew the Director's decision because it failed to address the Petitioner's response to the Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). The matter was remanded to evaluate the totality of circumstances regarding the bona fide job offer and to resolve whether the Beneficiary meets the minimum experience requirements.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The NOID requested evidence to prove a bona fide job opportunity existed despite personal ties and sought to clarify the Beneficiary's qualifications. The Petitioner provided a response which the Director ignored in the subsequent denial.

RFE Targets
Experience DocumentationBona Fide Job Opportunity

Evidence

Evidence Types
Reference Letters Dependent
Skills Required
  • at least two years of training or experience

Similar Cases

Bookkeeper

Retail · India

USCIS EB-3 dismissed
Massachusetts 2024-10-30
The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because the new evidence did not establish the Beneficiary's required two years of experience for the skilled worker classification. Unresolved inconsistencies in the Beneficiary's identity and entry dates, coupled with credibility concerns regarding evidence from his brother, undermined the probative value of the submitted documents. The Petitioner failed to meet the preponderance of evidence standard to prove eligibility.

Bookkeeper

Retail

USCIS EB-3 remanded
2024-02-20
The Director's initial denial regarding the beneficiary's qualifications was withdrawn because the evidence supported the required 24 months of experience. However, the case was remanded because the Petitioner failed to provide regulatory-required evidence (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2)) to demonstrate the ability to pay the proffered wage from the 2020 priority date onward.

Bookkeeper

Retail · India

USCIS EB-3 rfe dismissed
Texas 2024-04-08
The Petitioner failed to resolve material inconsistencies in the record with independent, objective evidence. New letters submitted on motion were not contemporaneous, lacked specificity regarding job duties and dates, and were written by individuals without access to official payroll records. The Petitioner also failed to demonstrate a continuing intent to employ the Beneficiary.
USCIS EB-3 dismissed
2024-07-05
The motion to reopen was dismissed because it failed to state new facts and only contained previously submitted materials. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because it did not demonstrate a misapplication of law or policy in the prior decision. The Petitioner failed to meet EB-3 requirements regarding the ability to pay and the beneficiary's qualifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-3 petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-07-05.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 1
Evidence Types 1

EB-3 Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 109
Success Rate 9.2%
Sustained 10
Dismissed 64

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist