Supply Chain Manager

The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to follow instructions for filing the appeal brief. Specifically, the Petitioner did not include a statement identifying an erroneous conclusion of law or fact with Form I-290B and mailed the brief to the USCIS Phoenix Lockbox instead of directly to the AAO, causing a delay in its incorporation into the record. Therefore, the AAO's summary dismissal of the appeal was affirmed.

The petitioner proposes to work in the supply chain industry in the United States. However, the specific details of the proposed endeavor, its methodologies, and its intended impact were not sufficiently elaborated in the petition.

The AAO dismissed the appeal and motions due to procedural errors. The petitioner failed to submit a timely brief and additional evidence to the AAO, instead sending it to the USCIS Phoenix Lockbox. Subsequent motions also did not establish that the prior AAO decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, nor did they provide new facts to overcome the procedural dismissal. The Director's original denial was based on the petitioner not establishing that a waiver of the job offer and labor certification would be in the national interest.

The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) dismissed the appeal and subsequent motions because the Petitioner misfiled the appeal brief to an incorrect address, resulting in its absence from the record during adjudication. The AAO found no error in its prior summary dismissal, which was mandated by 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) due to the lack of a brief or basis statement.