Physiotherapist

The petitioner proposes to work as a physiotherapist in the United States, treating patients with sports and orthopedic-related injuries and offering specialized training sessions to transfer knowledge to other U.S. physiotherapists.

The Petitioner proposes to work in the United States as a physical therapist and aesthetician. The endeavor involves providing physical therapy services and aesthetic treatments, though specific research or methodologies were not detailed in the decision.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for EB-2 as an individual of exceptional ability. The AAO found the petitioner did not meet three of the six regulatory criteria, specifically regarding 10 years of full-time experience, a license to practice a 'profession' as defined by regulations, and commanding a salary indicative of exceptional ability. The AAO also noted unresolved inconsistencies in employment claims, diminishing the credibility of evidence. The national interest waiver was not evaluated as the underlying EB-2 eligibility was not met.

The petitioner initially proposed to work as a physical therapist with a healthcare facility, but later shifted to opening and operating a physiotherapy business in Florida. The endeavor also involved providing guidance to multinational companies on cross-border contracts and expanding into the medical device and foreign investment markets.