Subsea Field Engineer

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's first prong. While the endeavor had substantial merit, the record did not demonstrate how his particular services would have a significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects. Furthermore, the petitioner did not sufficiently explain how his specific endeavor, separate from the general industry, would accomplish important goals like those related to clean energy, and expert letters focused on his skills rather than the national importance of his specific work.