Legal Professional Specialist
Law · Brazil · 2024-12-13
Proposed Endeavor
The petitioner proposes to collaborate with other legal professionals to address legal issues for the Brazilian and American population as a legal professional specialist or serve as a legal policy consultant. This work would involve areas such as tax reform legislation, intellectual property protection for technology companies, commercial law, public administration and prison system, and alternative dispute resolution.
Framework Evaluation
0 of 3 criteria metThe petitioner failed to demonstrate that her proposed endeavor's prospective impact rises to the level of national importance, specifically not showing her services extend beyond clients or offer substantial positive economic effects for the U.S.
While the petitioner presented evidence like education, experience, and recommendation letters related to this prong, the decision implies it was not sufficiently established or addressed in the context of the appeal's dismissal based on Prong 1.
The decision does not explicitly discuss the third Dhanasar prong, focusing primarily on the petitioner's failure to meet the first prong, thus implying this prong was also not met or sufficiently argued.
Why This Petition Was Denied
Evidence
Similar Cases
Consultant
Legal Services
Others
Legal Services · Brazil
Lawyer
Legal Services
Consultant
Legal Services · Brazil
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-12-13.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-2 (NIW) Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist