remanded EB-2 (NIW) RFE Issued

IT Specialist

IT Specialist · 2025-03-19

Decision Date
2025-03-19
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Proposed Endeavor

The Petitioner proposes to work as an IT specialist in the United States to enhance cybersecurity for U.S. enterprises. This endeavor aims to reduce the risk of cyber attacks, data breaches, and financial losses for these entities.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
1 Proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance Not Met

The Director concluded this prong was not met, but without providing an explanation for their conclusion regarding the national importance of the petitioner's cybersecurity endeavor.

2 Petitioner is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor Not Met

The Director focused solely on letters of recommendation, concluding they did not establish the Petitioner's achievements, and failed to analyze other submitted evidence.

3 On balance, it would benefit the US to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements Not Met

The Director stated the evidence did not support the Petitioner's assertion that a waiver would benefit the United States, without providing any analytical reasoning.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The Director denied the petition, concluding the petitioner did not establish eligibility for a national interest waiver. The AAO found the Director's decision lacked sufficient explanation and analysis for all three Dhanasar prongs. Specifically, the Director did not adequately explain why the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, why the petitioner was not well-positioned, or why waiving the job offer would not benefit the U.S. The AAO also disagreed with the Director's initial finding that the Petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional, noting the diploma was equivalent to 2-3 years of university study, not a bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent. The AAO remanded for re-evaluation of EB-2 exceptional ability criteria and a full Dhanasar analysis.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE initially led the Director to determine the Petitioner qualified for EB-2 as an advanced degree professional, a finding later disputed by the AAO. The RFE also implicitly targeted the national interest waiver prongs, as the Director's subsequent denial was based on these.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Reference Letters Dependent
High Salary
Professional Memberships
Original Contributions

Similar Cases

Others

Information Technology

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2024-10-01
The petitioner proposes to operate an IT consulting company specializing in providing cybersecurity services to various businesses. The endeavor aims to safeguard against data breaches and provide professional services within the cybersecurity field.

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Information Technology · Colombia

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) rfe remanded
Florida 2025-02-13
The petitioner proposes to develop a company providing cybersecurity services, specifically focusing on development, consulting, and training services for Critical Infrastructure Control Systems in both private and public sectors. The goal is to enhance cybersecurity within these systems.

Others

Information Technology · Jamaica

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) rfe dismissed
United States 2023-10-24
The petitioner proposes to provide electronic data protection services as a cybersecurity expert to reduce threats to organizations using best-in-class practices. The work aims to protect data and communications, maintain critical infrastructure, and strengthen national defense.

Cybersecurity Analyst

Information Technology

USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2024-08-01
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate exceptional ability for EB-2 classification. Although the Petitioner met three initial criteria (ten years of experience, license to practice, and professional association membership), the final merits determination found that certifications like CISSP and GIAC, and membership in ISC2 (over 600,000 members), did not prove expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the cybersecurity field. The Director noted that the claim of only 7% of U.S. cybersecurity professionals holding CISSP was uncorroborated. Consequently, the Dhanasar prongs for the national interest waiver were not evaluated.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-2 NIW petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-03-19.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 4

EB-2 (NIW) Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 3,813
Success Rate 53.7%
Sustained 2,046
Dismissed 1,671

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist