remanded EB-2 (NIW) RFE Issued
Pharmacist
Healthcare ยท 2022-04-18
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Proposed Endeavor
The Petitioner, a pharmacist, seeks to work in the United States in her professional capacity. The specific details of the research or clinical focus were not discussed in the remand decision due to an incomplete record.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
The decision was remanded because the Director failed to incorporate the Petitioner's timely RFE response into the record. The AAO could not determine if the Director considered the full evidence or adjudicate the merits of the national interest waiver without a complete record.
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe Director issued an RFE on November 5, 2020. Although the Petitioner submitted a timely response, the Director failed to include it in the record, necessitating a remand for proper consideration.
Similar Cases
Researcher
Others
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) remanded
2024-11-22
The petitioner's proposed endeavor is to work as a Researcher in the field of Nutrition. The specific research area, methodologies, and intended impact are not detailed in the provided text.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) rfe dismissed
2024-06-11
The record does not provide specific details regarding the petitioner's proposed endeavor beyond seeking an EB-2 National Interest Waiver.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) remanded
2024-05-21
The specific details of the proposed endeavor are not described in the decision text, as the appeal focused on the procedural dismissal of motions to reopen and reconsider.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-2 (NIW) dismissed
2024-07-29
The petitioner sought a national interest waiver for an unspecified endeavor. The record does not detail the specific research or work focus as the appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds regarding the filing of briefs and evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
A remanded EB-2 NIW petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2022-04-18.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
EB-2 (NIW) Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 3,813
Success Rate 53.7%
Sustained 2,046
Dismissed 1,671
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist