Financial Analyst

The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability. While the AAO reconsidered and withdrew its prior determination for the 10 years of experience criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B)), finding it met, the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of meeting three of the six categories. Specifically, the academic record (A) was not shown to be related to the claimed area of exceptional ability; the license/certification (C) was not demonstrated to be required or necessary to practice the profession; the high salary (D) was not shown to be a result of exceptional ability; membership in professional associations (E) was not established as the Trade Union was not proven to be a professional association; and recognition for achievements (F) only demonstrated employer recognition, not significant contributions to the field.

The petitioner proposes to work in the United States as a financial analyst, focusing on financial analysis and development within the financial industry. The work involves conducting quantitative analysis of financial data and business valuations.

The petitioner's proposed endeavor involves work as a financial analyst. The decision discusses the potential impact of this work on the field of finance and its national implications, including economic effects and job creation.

The Petitioner proposes to act as a CEO and Lead Analyst for her company to provide financial services to small and medium-sized enterprises. She intends to help these businesses increase profits, which she claims will benefit the broader U.S. economy.