Accountant And Finance Manager

The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because the previous motion was untimely filed, as USCIS regulations require actual receipt within 33 days, not mailing date. The Petitioner failed to provide evidence of timely receipt or a reasonable explanation for the delay. The motion to reconsider also failed to assert an incorrect application of law or policy in the prior decision.

The motion to reopen was dismissed because it was untimely filed and sent to the wrong location. The Petitioner's first motion was filed 54 days after the appeal dismissal, exceeding the 30-day (or 33-day for mailed) regulatory period. The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the delay was reasonable or beyond their control, and did not provide new evidence or facts to overcome the grounds for dismissal.

The Petitioner proposes to work as a finance manager. However, the specific details of the research area or methodologies were not elaborated upon in this motion dismissal, and evidence submitted showed her working as a 'product builder' and 'caregiver'.

The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because it was not timely filed. The motion was received on June 4, 2024, 36 days after the appeal decision was issued on April 29, 2024, exceeding the 33-day deadline. Additionally, the Petitioner sent the motion to the USCIS Dallas Lockbox instead of the designated USCIS Phoenix Lockbox for decisions originating from the Texas Service Center, failing to comply with filing instructions.