Entrepreneur

The petitioner, an entrepreneur, seeks to work in the United States within an unspecified field of business. The record does not provide specific details regarding the research area, methodologies, or intended impact of the endeavor beyond the petitioner's status as an entrepreneur.

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner's motion to reopen and reconsider was filed on June 13, 2023, which was beyond the 30-day regulatory deadline from the petition denial date of December 8, 2022. The petitioner did not provide an explanation for the delay or establish that the delay was reasonable, thus failing to meet the requirements for excusing an untimely filing.

The petitioner seeks to work as an entrepreneur in the United States. Specific details regarding the research area, methodologies, or intended impact of the endeavor were not discussed in the decision as it focused on procedural signature validity.

The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner did not assert any new facts or provide new documentary evidence, instead resubmitting previously provided documents. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, specifically failing to provide corroborating evidence for timely delivery and misinterpreting the 'mailbox rule' which does not apply to USCIS proceedings governed by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i) requiring actual receipt.