Entrepreneur In Commercial Management

The petitioner, an entrepreneur, seeks to work in the United States within an unspecified field of business. The record does not provide specific details regarding the research area, methodologies, or intended impact of the endeavor beyond the petitioner's status as an entrepreneur.

The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed. The initial appeal was dismissed as untimely, filed 40 days after the Director's decision. The petitioner's argument that submission to USPS was equivalent to submission to USCIS was rejected, as USCIS considers a request received only when physically or electronically received at a designated filing location. No tracking data was provided to prove timely mailing or receipt. For the motion to reopen, the petitioner did not establish eligibility. For the motion to reconsider, the petitioner failed to show the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy.

The AAO dismissed the motions to reopen and reconsider because the Petitioner misfiled the appeal brief to an incorrect address, leading to the summary dismissal of the initial appeal. The new evidence (FedEx label) confirmed the misfiling, thus not demonstrating an error in the AAO's prior decision to summarily dismiss the appeal due to the absence of a brief.

The Petitioner proposes to work as a restaurant manager and entrepreneur, focusing on the economic impact of his proposed business. The text does not provide specific details regarding the methodology or research area of the endeavor.