remanded EB-1C RFE Issued

Software Development Manager

Software To The Airline Industry · India · 2025-03-04

Decision Date
2025-03-04
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Qualifying Relationship (Met)

The AAO found that the Beneficiary's employment in India for the Petitioner's affiliate, while on the U.S. entity's payroll, satisfied the requirement of working for the 'same employer' or a related entity abroad, as contemplated by the statute and regulations.

Foreign Employment Duration (Met)

The AAO determined that the Beneficiary's 2022-2023 employment took place while she was physically outside the United States, fulfilling the 'employed outside the United States for at least one year' requirement, despite being paid by the U.S. entity. The AAO clarified that being on the U.S. entity's payroll while physically working abroad for an affiliate does not disqualify the foreign employment.

Managerial Capacity (Not Met)

The Director initially denied this criterion, and the AAO remanded the case for a determination on the merits of whether the Beneficiary's employment abroad meets the requirements of a managerial capacity, indicating it has not yet been definitively met.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The AAO withdrew the Director's decision, finding that the Petitioner established its ability to pay the proffered salary of $142,088 per year through consolidated tax returns showing sufficient net current assets and proof of salary payments, also considering a merger that combined assets. The AAO also determined that the Beneficiary's employment in India, even while on the U.S. entity's payroll, constituted qualifying employment abroad under the statute and regulations, as the key factor is physical presence outside the U.S. and working for the 'same employer' or a related entity. The matter was remanded for a determination on the merits of the managerial capacity claim.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Successfully Addressed

The RFE questioned the Beneficiary's foreign employment duration, citing evidence suggesting U.S. work since 2017. The Petitioner clarified that the Beneficiary was physically stationed in India, working for an affiliate, despite being paid by the U.S. entity.

RFE Targets
Foreign Employment Duration

Evidence

Evidence Types
Tax Returns
Payroll Records
Reference Letters Dependent
Internal Communications
Performance Reviews
Evidence Submitted
  • letter from senior vice president detailing duties and subordinates
  • email messages
  • performance reviews

Similar Cases

Project Manager

Software · India

USCIS EB-1C sustained
2023-01-12
The AAO determined that the Beneficiary's period in L-1A status and temporary transfer back to the Indian subsidiary did not interrupt the continuity of employment within the multinational organization. The qualifying period was correctly calculated by reaching back to the period preceding his initial 2014 entry to the United States. Consequently, the Beneficiary satisfied the requirement of at least one year of foreign employment in a managerial capacity within the relevant three-year window.

Director

Marketing and Advertising · India

USCIS EB-1C rfe dismissed
New York 2024-11-22
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the Beneficiary was employed abroad in a primarily managerial capacity for at least one year. The evidence provided, including job descriptions and an organizational chart, did not sufficiently distinguish the Beneficiary's role from other senior data scientists or demonstrate primary engagement in managerial duties over operational tasks. The RFE response also lacked specific details on time breakdown for duties and managerial authority over personnel.

Director

Information Technology

USCIS EB-1C rfe remanded
2024-09-10
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision because it was based almost exclusively on the Beneficiary being the Petitioner's sole U.S. employee at the time of filing, without adequately considering other evidence. The Director failed to analyze the Beneficiary's submitted job description, the Petitioner's descriptions of its business and client services function, the group's global organizational chart, and evidence of offshore employees working on U.S. contracts. Additionally, the AAO noted that the record lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate the Beneficiary's foreign employment in a managerial or executive capacity for the required period, specifically regarding the organizational structure and staffing of the foreign affiliate between 2016 and 2018.
USCIS EB-1C dismissed
2990 days 2024-12-19
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The Petitioner did not resolve numerous discrepancies regarding the Beneficiary's claimed employment abroad (inconsistent dates, salary, and employer claims on NIV application) and her U.S. position (inability to describe duties during site visit, spouse performing duties, conflicting ownership information, and inconsistent tax returns).

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-1C petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-03-04.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1C Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 89
Success Rate 15.7%
Sustained 14
Dismissed 47

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist