sustained EB-1C

Helicopter Pilot Instructor And Manager Of Its Search And Rescue Training Operations

Helicopter Services Company · 2024-09-25

Decision Date
2024-09-25
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 2 criteria met
Foreign Employment Duration (Met)

The Beneficiary was employed abroad for at least one year in a managerial or executive capacity within the three years preceding the petition filing (December 2019 to February 2023).

Managerial Capacity (Function Manager) (Met)

The Petitioner established that the Beneficiary was employed abroad as a function manager, overseeing the essential search and rescue training department, acting at a senior level, and primarily managing rather than performing the function.

Why This Petition Was Approved

Upon de novo review, the AAO concluded the Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Beneficiary was employed abroad as a function manager. The Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish that the Beneficiary managed the foreign employer's essential search and rescue department accounting for a significant portion of its operations abroad. The Petitioner further demonstrated on appeal that the Beneficiary was employed in a senior position and primarily relieved from non-qualifying operational duties by a subordinate chief flight instructor and several other subordinate flight instructors providing search and rescue training to military, police, and civilian clients. The Petitioner sufficiently established that the Beneficiary was employed abroad as a function manager and is eligible for the benefit sought.

Evidence

Evidence Submitted
  • Managed the foreign employer's essential search and rescue department accounting for a significant portion of its operations abroad
  • Employed in a senior position
  • Primarily relieved from non-qualifying operational duties by a subordinate chief flight instructor and several other subordinate flight instructors

Similar Cases

Others

Aerospace

USCIS EB-1C sustained
2024-10-21
The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) sustained the appeal, finding that the plain language of the statute and USCIS Policy Manual allows for a beneficiary to be employed abroad by the U.S. petitioner within a qualifying multinational organization. The AAO concluded that the principal focus is on the continuity of employment within the same multinational organization, and there is no prohibition on transferring an overseas-based employee directly employed by a U.S. petitioner. The Beneficiary was continuously employed within the Petitioner's multinational organization for at least one year preceding his U.S. entry.

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Transportation · Argentina

USCIS EB-1C remanded
United States 2024-08-29
The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the matter, finding the Director erred by requiring the Beneficiary to supervise professional subordinates and oversee a 'complex' organizational hierarchy to qualify as an executive. The AAO concluded that the record, supplemented on appeal, sufficiently established the Beneficiary's executive capacity abroad through detailed duty descriptions, organizational charts, and evidence of executive-level tasks. The Director is instructed to re-evaluate the U.S. employment in light of the correct executive definition.

Operations Manager

Transportation

USCIS EB-1C rfe dismissed
Georgia 2023-05-09
The appeal was dismissed based on the Petitioner's request to withdraw the filing. However, the AAO affirmed the Director's finding of willful misrepresentation because the Petitioner and Beneficiary provided false information regarding organizational structure, staffing, and the Beneficiary's actual employment history.
USCIS EB-1C rfe remanded
North Carolina 2025-03-18
The Director's decision was withdrawn because it incorrectly required a separate foreign legal entity when a branch office is sufficient under the regulations. The case was remanded to determine if the petitioner meets the 'doing business' requirement, as current evidence primarily showed seasonal activity and the purchase of services rather than the provision of services.

Frequently Asked Questions

A sustained EB-1C (I-140) petition means USCIS determined the petitioner met the eligibility requirements. For appealed cases, "sustained" means the appeal reversed a prior denial. The petitioner can proceed to the next step in the immigration process.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-09-25.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome sustained
Criteria Met 2 / 2

EB-1C Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 89
Success Rate 15.7%
Sustained 14
Dismissed 47

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist