dismissed EB-1A
Soccer Coach
Youth Soccer League · United Kingdom · 2025-02-25
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
0 of 3 criteria metAwards and Recognition (Not Met)
The 2018 award lacked sufficient evidence of national or international recognition, with documentation only showing recognition from the awarding university and football league trust, not a larger audience.
Membership in Associations (Not Met)
Membership in the FA Coaches' Club did not require 'outstanding achievements' or judgment by 'recognized national or international experts,' as its requirements were deemed basic coaching certifications and professional development.
Published Material About the Alien (Not Met)
Online articles mentioning the beneficiary lacked evidence of appearing in 'professional or major trade publications or other major media' due to missing circulation, readership, or viewership data and target audience information.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision misapplied law or USCIS policy. The AAO affirmed that the beneficiary did not meet the required three out of ten EB-1A criteria. The 2018 award lacked evidence of national or international recognition, and the FA Coaches' Club membership requirements were deemed basic, not 'outstanding achievements' judged by experts. Furthermore, the submitted articles about the beneficiary lacked evidence of appearing in 'professional or major trade publications or other major media' due to missing circulation/readership data and target audience information.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Awards
Professional Memberships
Media Coverage
Evidence Submitted
- Article stating receipt of a 2018 award
- Membership in the Football Association (FA) Coaches' Club
- Online articles identifying and quoting the Beneficiary as a soccer coach (Napa Valley Register, NPSL.com, Daily Echo, EFL Trust.com)
Similar Cases
Coach
Sports
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-12-03
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Beneficiary met at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the Beneficiary did not receive any nationally or internationally recognized awards personally, membership in the FA Coaches' Club did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts, and published materials were not shown to be from professional or major trade publications or other major media. The decision emphasized that the Beneficiary was not shown to be among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Others
Sports · Chile
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-06-18
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, as most achievements (Copa America 2015, Chilean League titles) occurred years prior to the filing. Although he met criteria for awards, memberships, published material, and leading roles, the evidence did not reflect a 'career of acclaimed work' or status at the very top of the field. Specific metrics like the 2012 'Best Footballer' award were deemed institutional rather than indicative of national/international excellence.
Athletic Trainer
Sports · Venezuela
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-09-06
The Director's decision was withdrawn and the matter remanded because the Director's unfavorable determinations regarding several evidentiary criteria did not specifically address all Petitioner's claims or evidence, and in some instances, did not adhere to USCIS regulations and policy guidance. Specifically, the Director mischaracterized the Petitioner's field by distinguishing 'coach' from 'trainer', improperly introduced derogatory information from outside the record without giving the Petitioner an opportunity to rebut, and did not provide sufficient analysis for conclusions on original contributions and leading roles. The Director also failed to provide notice of evidentiary deficiencies for published materials.
Coach
Sports
USCIS EB-1A remanded
2024-12-12
The AAO remanded the case because the Director's decision lacked sufficient explanation for denying the petition, failing to adequately address or analyze the evidence submitted for four specific EB-1A criteria. The Director improperly disregarded articles for lack of legible URLs or author names, summarily dismissed judging evidence without specificity, misapplied the law regarding 'leading or critical role' by requiring an 'entire organization' role, and erroneously discounted a job offer as evidence for 'high salary' by requiring actual wages earned.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-02-25.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 3
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 883
Success Rate 52.8%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 300
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist